Christian Jankowski, Matyáš Chochola / The most successful couple of the epoch
curated by Maria Chiara Valacchi
November 15, 2018 – 16 February 2019
Cabinet
Via Tadino 20
20124, Milan
Photo credit: Filippo ArmellinImages courtesy of the artists and Cabinet
It is thanks to Giambattista Vico, a philosopher who lived between the 17th and 18th centuries, if we have learned the theory of
history’s eternal “course and recourse,” a hypothetical and incessant repetition of three distinct cycles: the primitive and divine age,
the poetic and heroic age and the civil and human age, all governed by sacred providence; a cadenced historical digression that can
bring back, over time and under new forms, certain social, cultural and aesthetic archetypes. At a distance of three centuries, another
philosopher, the German Ulrich Beck, identifies our era, commonly defined as “contemporary,” as a historical period in which more
things happen, in fact, “contemporaneously.” In this so-called “second modernity,” Beck argues that the pluralist dynamics of “and”
replace the exclusive ones of “or,” leaving more room for an idea of opposites’ complementarity, as well as experiments with
synthesis, osmosis, inclusion and ambivalence. These are the premises that inaugurate the concepts of time, past and present, which
are weaved together in this exhibition by Christian Jankowski and Matyáš Chocola entitled the most successful couple of the epoch, a
phrase taken from the ballad “Leg ‘Doch Nur Einmal Den Arm Um Mich ‘rum ” of 1973, written by the singer Hildegard Knef: a
melancholic and decadent waltz that metaphorically seals the creative bond between the two artists and accompanies the exhibition’s
eclectic dialogue between the languages of installation, sculpture and the pictorial, each saturated with artistic memories.
history’s eternal “course and recourse,” a hypothetical and incessant repetition of three distinct cycles: the primitive and divine age,
the poetic and heroic age and the civil and human age, all governed by sacred providence; a cadenced historical digression that can
bring back, over time and under new forms, certain social, cultural and aesthetic archetypes. At a distance of three centuries, another
philosopher, the German Ulrich Beck, identifies our era, commonly defined as “contemporary,” as a historical period in which more
things happen, in fact, “contemporaneously.” In this so-called “second modernity,” Beck argues that the pluralist dynamics of “and”
replace the exclusive ones of “or,” leaving more room for an idea of opposites’ complementarity, as well as experiments with
synthesis, osmosis, inclusion and ambivalence. These are the premises that inaugurate the concepts of time, past and present, which
are weaved together in this exhibition by Christian Jankowski and Matyáš Chocola entitled the most successful couple of the epoch, a
phrase taken from the ballad “Leg ‘Doch Nur Einmal Den Arm Um Mich ‘rum ” of 1973, written by the singer Hildegard Knef: a
melancholic and decadent waltz that metaphorically seals the creative bond between the two artists and accompanies the exhibition’s
eclectic dialogue between the languages of installation, sculpture and the pictorial, each saturated with artistic memories.
Matyáš Chochola chooses to represent the universal role of the artist, always able to manipulate the past in the service of
contemporaneity, by borrowing two mythological figures: Perseus and the Medusa.
contemporaneity, by borrowing two mythological figures: Perseus and the Medusa.
“To cut off Medusa’s head without being petrified, Perseus sustains himself on what is lightest around him, the winds and the clouds;
and he pushes his gaze on what can only be revealed in an indirect way, in an image captured by a mirror. Immediately I feel the
temptation to find in this myth an allegory of the relationship of the poet with the world, and a lesson of the method to follow […] “.
and he pushes his gaze on what can only be revealed in an indirect way, in an image captured by a mirror. Immediately I feel the
temptation to find in this myth an allegory of the relationship of the poet with the world, and a lesson of the method to follow […] “.
Borrowing from Italo Calvino, Chochola establishes a “reflective” relationship with the world, facing it with the lightness of a self-
portrait-sculpture that, rising tall in the center of the room, speaks indirectly of himself and the powerful dichotomy between hero
and enemy, artist and system. The result is a Perseus who protects himself with his large circular shield from a luminous Medusa
with an 80cm diameter; a logo halfway between a pop icon and a neon installation radiates a psychedelic glow from the ceiling: a
contemporary Iliad that takes on new signifiers and tells of more earthly deeds, of an art system that cynically exalts and forgets at
the same time.
portrait-sculpture that, rising tall in the center of the room, speaks indirectly of himself and the powerful dichotomy between hero
and enemy, artist and system. The result is a Perseus who protects himself with his large circular shield from a luminous Medusa
with an 80cm diameter; a logo halfway between a pop icon and a neon installation radiates a psychedelic glow from the ceiling: a
contemporary Iliad that takes on new signifiers and tells of more earthly deeds, of an art system that cynically exalts and forgets at
the same time.
Christian Jankowski instead chooses to deal with an era closer to us, the nineteenth century, through a series of famous self-portraits
by Van Gogh that Jankowski reproduces in pictorial copies, overturning their primary sense.
by Van Gogh that Jankowski reproduces in pictorial copies, overturning their primary sense.
“The past carries with it a secret index that it defers to redemption. Does not a breath of the air that blew around those before us
touch us now? Is there not, in the voices that we listen to, an echo of now muted voices? […] If so, then there is a mysterious
encounter between the generations that have been and our own. Then, we were awaited on earth. Then to us, as to every generation
that was before us, a weak Messianic force was given, to which the past has the right.”
touch us now? Is there not, in the voices that we listen to, an echo of now muted voices? […] If so, then there is a mysterious
encounter between the generations that have been and our own. Then, we were awaited on earth. Then to us, as to every generation
that was before us, a weak Messianic force was given, to which the past has the right.”
As with the words of Walter Benjamin, Jankoswki’s works define themselves as bearers of this message of synthesis, thanks to the
comparison that emerges between the famous self-portraits and two photographic images taken from the series “We are innocent
when we sleep,” disturbing and tragicomic portraits with a grotesque essence. A transition for their witness between the search for
beauty, its innovation and the current destruction of the image.
comparison that emerges between the famous self-portraits and two photographic images taken from the series “We are innocent
when we sleep,” disturbing and tragicomic portraits with a grotesque essence. A transition for their witness between the search for
beauty, its innovation and the current destruction of the image.
A multifaceted iconographic dialogue in constant evolution but firmly built on the formula of the relationship and of the
interdependence between true or imagined “couples”.
interdependence between true or imagined “couples”.