24 kleurplaten at Billytown
Guillaume Bijl, Pim Blokker, Melle de Boer, Kim David Bots, Prosper Desmet, Afra Eisma, Johan Gustavsson, Paul de Jong, Maja Klaassens, Frank Koolen, Joost Krijnen, Marius Lut, Jos van Merendonk, Maje Mellin & Enric Fort Ballester, Bernice Nauta, Robbert Pauwels, Machteld Rullens, Maaike Schoorel, Lieven Segers, Dieuwke Spaans, Thomas Swinkels, Derk Thijs, Evi Vingerling, Henk Visch, Riette Wanders and Marieke van’t Zet
30 November, 2018 – 12 January, 2019
Billytown
Helena Van
Doeverenplantsoen 3
2512ZB, The Hague, Netherlands 
![]()  | 
| Maje Mellin & Enric Fort Ballester | 
![]()  | 
| Evi Vingerling | 
![]()  | 
| Marieke van ‘t Zet | 
![]()  | 
| Jos van Merendonk | 
![]()  | 
| Afra Eisma | 
![]()  | 
| Bernice Nauta | 
When a child repeats information, they are levelling up, proving their capacity to imitate a higher, more developed being. The coloring page trains this kind of competence, motor skills are refined; color inside the lines and you’re doing good. But in the end, the phrase ‘coloring inside the lines’ is used for an uptight person, who doesn’t dare express their individuality beyond the confines of expectations. Not surprisingly, coloring books for adults are criticized as void of creativity. Popularity has a singularly curdling effect.
“What color am I ?” 
Experiment subject Alex the parrot (1976-2007), repeated the words he was taught to tick our boxes of intelligence. However, he also used them to manipulate the situation to get what he wanted, or to show he was fed up: “Wanna go back,” was one of his more uncomfortable demands. The symbolism of the bird as a creature that moves between worlds bearing divine messages does not exactly apply to parrots, who regurgitate messages we teach them to say. With Alex, it didn’t feel like regurgitation, it felt like repetition with difference. 
One of the characteristics of print and editions is that the repetition creates a kind of equality, while difference suggests hierarchies. Masterpiece worship then falls away, and the image itself can be both exaggerated and emptied of meaning. In this exhibition, the image that is the coloring page could have been anything. What is interesting is the mechanism of interpretation; the different ways artists diverge from the same, single line. This mechanism is what got Alex on TV, and what got the New York Times to publish his last words: “You be good, see you tomorrow, I love you.” 
Maja Klaassens 2018
Images courtesy by the artists and Billytown
Phographs by Jhoeko
Please note all images courtesy by the artists and Billytown
All photographs by Jhoeko
24 KLEURPLATEN
GUILLAUME BIJL, PIM BLOKKER, 
MELLE DE BOER, KIM DAVID 
BOTS, PROSPER DESMET, AFRA 
EISMA, JOHAN GUSTAVSSON, 
PAUL DE JONG, MAJA KLAAS
–
SENS, FRANK KOOLEN, JOOST 
KRIJNEN, MARIUS LUT, JOS VAN 
MERENDONK, MAJE MELLIN 
& ENRIC FORT BALLESTER, 
BERNICE NAUTA, ROBBERT 
PAUWELS, MACHTELD RULLENS, 
MAAIKE SCHOOREL, LIEVEN 
SEGERS, DIEUWKE SPAANS, 
THOMAS SWINKELS, DERK 
THIJS, EVI VINGERLING, HENK 
VISCH, RIETTE WANDERS EN 
MARIEKE VAN ’T ZET
24 KLEURPLATEN
GUILLAUME BIJL, PIM BLOKKER, 
MELLE DE BOER, KIM DAVID 
BOTS, PROSPER DESMET, AFRA 
EISMA, JOHAN GUSTAVSSON, 
PAUL DE JONG, MAJA KLAAS
–
SENS, FRANK KOOLEN, JOOST 
KRIJNEN, MARIUS LUT, JOS VAN 
MERENDONK, MAJE MELLIN 
& ENRIC FORT BALLESTER, 
BERNICE NAUTA, ROBBERT 
PAUWELS, MACHTELD RULLENS, 
MAAIKE SCHOOREL, LIEVEN 
SEGERS, DIEUWKE SPAANS, 
THOMAS SWINKELS, DERK 
THIJS, EVI VINGERLING, HENK 
VISCH, RIETTE WANDERS EN 
MARIEKE VAN ’T ZET
When a child repeats information, they are 
leveling up, proving their capacity to imitate a 
higher, more developed being. The coloring 
page trains this kind of competence, motor 
skills are refined; color inside the lines and 
you’re doing good. But in the end, the phrase 
‘coloring inside the lines’ is used for an uptight 
person, who doesn’t dare express their 
individuality beyond the confines of expecta
–
tions. Not surprisingly, coloring books for adults 
are criticized as void of creativity. Popularity 
has a singularly curdling effect.
“What color am I ?”  
Experiment subject Alex the parrot (1976-
2007), repeated the words he was taught to tick 
our boxes of intelligence. However he also 
used them to manipulate the situation to get 
what he wanted, or to show he was fed up: 
“Wanna go back,”  was one of his more 
uncomfortable demands. The symbolism of the 
bird as a creature that moves between worlds 
bearing divine messages does not exactly 
apply to parrots, who regurgitate messages we 
teach them to say. With Alex, it didn’t feel like 
regurgitation, it felt like repetition with differ
–
ence. 
One of the characteristics of print and editions 
is that the repetition creates a kind of equality, 
while difference suggests hierarchies. Master
–
piece worship then falls away, and the image 
itself can be both exaggerated and emptied of 
meaning. In this exhibition, the image that is 
the coloring page could have been anything. 
What is interesting is the mechanism of 
interpretation; the different ways artists diverge 
from the same, single line. This mechanism is 
what got Alex on TV, and what got the New 
York Times to publish his last words:“You be 
good, see you tomorrow, I love you.”  
Maja Klaassens 2018
When a child repeats information, they are 
leveling up, proving their capacity to imitate a 
higher, more developed being. The coloring 
page trains this kind of competence, motor 
skills are refined; color inside the lines and 
you’re doing good. But in the end, the phrase 
‘coloring inside the lines’ is used for an uptight 
person, who doesn’t dare express their 
individuality beyond the confines of expecta
–
tions. Not surprisingly, coloring books for adults 
are criticized as void of creativity. Popularity 
has a singularly curdling effect.
“What color am I ?”  
Experiment subject Alex the parrot (1976-
2007), repeated the words he was taught to tick 
our boxes of intelligence. However he also 
used them to manipulate the situation to get 
what he wanted, or to show he was fed up: 
“Wanna go back,”  was one of his more 
uncomfortable demands. The symbolism of the 
bird as a creature that moves between worlds 
bearing divine messages does not exactly 
apply to parrots, who regurgitate messages we 
teach them to say. With Alex, it didn’t feel like 
regurgitation, it felt like repetition with differ
–
ence. 
One of the characteristics of print and editions 
is that the repetition creates a kind of equality, 
while difference suggests hierarchies. Master
–
piece worship then falls away, and the image 
itself can be both exaggerated and emptied of 
meaning. In this exhibition, the image that is 
the coloring page could have been anything. 
What is interesting is the mechanism of 
interpretation; the different ways artists diverge 
from the same, single line. This mechanism is 
what got Alex on TV, and what got the New 
York Times to publish his last words:“You be 
good, see you tomorrow, I love you.”  
Maja Klaassens 2018
When a child repeats information, they are 
leveling up, proving their capacity to imitate a 
higher, more developed being. The coloring 
page trains this kind of competence, motor 
skills are refined; color inside the lines and 
you’re doing good. But in the end, the phrase 
‘coloring inside the lines’ is used for an uptight 
person, who doesn’t dare express their 
individuality beyond the confines of expecta
–
tions. Not surprisingly, coloring books for adults 
are criticized as void of creativity. Popularity 
has a singularly curdling effect.
“What color am I ?”  
Experiment subject Alex the parrot (1976-
2007), repeated the words he was taught to tick 
our boxes of intelligence. However he also 
used them to manipulate the situation to get 
what he wanted, or to show he was fed up: 
“Wanna go back,”  was one of his more 
uncomfortable demands. The symbolism of the 
bird as a creature that moves between worlds 
bearing divine messages does not exactly 
apply to parrots, who regurgitate messages we 
teach them to say. With Alex, it didn’t feel like 
regurgitation, it felt like repetition with differ
–
ence. 
One of the characteristics of print and editions 
is that the repetition creates a kind of equality, 
while difference suggests hierarchies. Master
–
piece worship then falls away, and the image 
itself can be both exaggerated and emptied of 
meaning. In this exhibition, the image that is 
the coloring page could have been anything. 
What is interesting is the mechanism of 
interpretation; the different ways artists diverge 
from the same, single line. This mechanism is 
what got Alex on TV, and what got the New 
York Times to publish his last words:“You be 
good, see you tomorrow, I love you.”  
Maja Klaassens 2018

                                                    






